Combining LLMs with BREs for Business Logic

Flynn

Administrator
Staff member
Bronze Member
Silver Member
Gold Member
Platinum Member

Combining LLMs with BREs for Business Logic​




1. Introduction​


For decades, Business Rules Engines (BREs) have given organizations a way to separate business logic from core application code. They enforce consistency, compliance, and adaptability. Meanwhile, Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-4, Claude, and Gemini have opened up entirely new horizons in understanding, generating, and reasoning with natural language.


When combined, LLMs and BREs create a hybrid decision intelligence system: the BRE ensures reliability and auditability, while the LLM brings contextual reasoning, adaptive responses, and user-friendly interfaces. This hybrid can power LLCs to move faster, stay compliant, and make smarter decisions without bloating staff costs.




2. Why Combine LLMs and BREs?​


BRE Strengths


  • Deterministic and auditable (rules are transparent).
  • Excellent for compliance-heavy logic (eligibility, pricing, workflows).
  • Versioning and governance already built in.

LLM Strengths


  • Understands and generates natural language queries.
  • Infers patterns from unstructured text (emails, contracts, reports).
  • Suggests new rules by analyzing historical data or policy documents.

The Hybrid Advantage


  • Interpretation Layer: LLMs translate natural-language requirements into machine-executable rules.
  • Contextual Guidance: BREs run rules consistently, while LLMs explain why a decision was made in plain English.
  • Dynamic Updates: LLMs suggest new or modified rules; BREs validate, test, and enforce them.

This synergy combines the best of predictive intelligence (LLMs) and prescriptive governance (BREs).




3. Real-World Use Cases​


1. Contract Compliance in LLCs


  • LLM scans incoming contracts, extracts obligations (payment terms, penalties).
  • BRE enforces compliance rules (e.g., “Invoices over 30 days trigger escalation”).
  • Together: Automated compliance without manual contract review.

2. Customer Service Logic


  • LLM interprets a customer complaint email.
  • BRE applies escalation rules: “If sentiment = negative AND account value > $10,000, escalate to senior rep.”
  • Together: Intelligent triage combining emotional tone with strict escalation rules.

3. Dynamic Pricing for Small Ventures


  • LLM detects patterns in competitor pricing from scraped text data.
  • BRE ensures guardrails: “Prices cannot fall below cost + 15% margin.”
  • Together: Smart, adaptive pricing without violating profitability thresholds.

4. Fraud Detection in Finance


  • LLM identifies unusual patterns from unstructured transaction notes.
  • BRE enforces hard thresholds: “Any transaction > $50,000 outside business hours requires dual approval.”
  • Together: Human-like detection meets hard compliance barriers.



4. Technical Integration Models​


Model 1: LLM Pre-Processor for BREs


  • LLM converts natural language inputs (policies, user requests) into BRE rules.
  • Example: “Give 10% discount to first-time customers who sign up this month” → BRE decision table row.

Model 2: LLM as Post-Processor


  • BRE executes deterministic rules.
  • LLM explains decision outcomes in plain English for end-users or audit reports.
  • Example: “Application denied” → LLM expands: “Denied because income was below threshold and credit history showed 3 defaults.”

Model 3: Side-by-Side Decisioning


  • Both BRE and LLM provide recommendations.
  • BRE ensures guardrails, while LLM provides creative or contextual suggestions.
  • Example: Hiring system—BRE enforces legal requirements, LLM highlights “soft fit” cultural indicators.

Model 4: Feedback Loop


  • BRE runs existing rules.
  • LLM monitors data and recommends new candidate rules for humans to approve.
  • Example: Detects customers frequently leaving after price increases, proposes: “Add a churn-risk discount rule.”



5. Tools and Platforms Supporting Hybrid Logic​


  • Drools + GPT: Open-source BRE (Drools) paired with LLM for natural language rule authoring.
  • Rulebricks AI Wizard: Already offering rule creation from plain English prompts.
  • InRule + ML: Combines traditional rules with explainable machine learning.
  • IBM ODM + GenAI: IBM has prototypes of using LLMs to propose or simulate rule outcomes.
  • DecisionRules.io: Cloud-native BRE, easily paired with LLM APIs for hybrid workflows.

Emerging trend: Decision Intelligence Platforms—blending structured rule execution with adaptive AI reasoning.




6. Benefits for LLCs​


  1. Speed – Non-technical staff can propose rules via natural language.
  2. Compliance – BRE keeps regulatory guardrails intact.
  3. Transparency – LLM explains decisions in business language.
  4. Adaptability – Rules evolve faster, reducing lag between strategy and implementation.
  5. Cost Efficiency – Cuts need for large analyst teams to maintain static rules.



7. Challenges and Considerations​


  • Hallucinations: LLMs may generate incorrect rules if not constrained.
  • Governance: Who approves LLM-suggested rules? Humans must remain in the loop.
  • Data Privacy: Feeding sensitive data into external LLM APIs requires compliance checks.
  • Performance: LLM queries can be slower than BRE execution—batching or caching may be needed.
  • Explainability: Regulators may demand deterministic trails; LLM logic alone isn’t enough.



8. Best Practices for Integration​


  1. Use BRE as the Source of Truth – LLMs can propose rules, but the BRE executes them.
  2. Keep Humans in Approval Loops – Validate AI-suggested rules before deployment.
  3. Version Everything – Every LLM-suggested rule should be versioned in the BRE for audit.
  4. Pilot in Low-Risk Domains – Start with marketing logic or customer segmentation before compliance-heavy use cases.
  5. Secure APIs – Use private LLM endpoints or local models for sensitive data.
  6. Measure ROI – Track rule change turnaround, decision accuracy, and error reduction.



9. Future Outlook​


The combination of LLMs and BREs is moving toward autonomous decision intelligence systems. Expect:


  • Natural-Language Rule Governance: Managers dictating policy in English, instantly executable in BRE.
  • Continuous Learning BREs: LLMs analyzing logs to suggest optimizations.
  • Multi-Modal Decisioning: LLMs + BREs consuming not just text but sensor data, images, and voice for richer business decisions.
  • AI Regulators: BREs with explainable AI layers will become essential in industries where compliance and transparency are legally mandated.

In 5 years, most LLCs will likely run hybrid AI+BRE infrastructures, where LLMs act as copilots for business policy, and BREs act as the law enforcement layer.




10. Conclusion​


BREs provide structure, auditability, and compliance; LLMs provide adaptability, reasoning, and accessibility. When combined, they form a powerful operational fabric that enables LLCs to codify business logic with both rigor and flexibility.


The key is balance: let BREs enforce rules while LLMs enrich, explain, and adapt them. Together, they allow small ventures and LLCs to achieve Fortune-500-level decision intelligence without the overhead.
 
Back
Top